Sign In
Explore
Map of Science
Advanced Search
Tutorials
Participate
Upload article
Edit self-journal
Co
v1.1 Feb 2020
Ludo Waltman
Follow Ludo Waltman
Profile
Articles
0 ARTICLES
Reviews
(16)
Discussions
(0)
Prioritizations
(1)
Self-Journal
0 SUBSCRIBER
0 ISSUE
Personal information
Affiliation(s)
Centre for Science and Technology Studies – Leiden University
2300 AX Leiden, The Netherlands
Expertise
All issues
Ludo Waltman's Self-Journal
No issue has been released yet
Date of release
Number of reviews
Priority
Number of editors
Reviews
Reviews
Discussions
Prioritizations
By date
By vote +
By vote -
By controversiality
0
0
On 2017 April 13 - I think the introduction section can be strengthened by making explicit links with the ide...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 13 - "Criticism of the current academic evaluation system traditionally focuses on the problematic use of journal reputation as a proxy for scientific quality...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - I like many of the ideas proposed in the paper. I am not sure whether all ideas will be equally successful, but in general I believe that the paper suggests the right direction in which scientific publishing and research evaluation should develop...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - "We have proposed and described an evaluation system that promotes a well-defined notion of scientific value in which objective and subjective aspects are disentangled as validity and importance...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "in nature an is" -> "in nature and is"
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - This section needs to be better integrated in the rest of the paper. Open science hasn't been discussed at all in earlier parts of the paper, and therefore it appears rather unexpectedly in this section of the paper...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "we argue that they are in many respects preferable to journal rankings and impact factors in capturing scientific value" Why do you focus so strongly on journals in your argument? What about indicators based on the citations received by the articles of a scientist (e...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - The idea of open source modules is briefly introduced, but a proper explanation is lacking...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "unlike citations and usage statistics, two accomplices are unable to create an infinite loop that boosts the importance of each other's articles...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - In my view, a starting point of the discussion on gaming should be that any measurement system will in some way be susceptible to gaming (Goodhart's law)...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "It is in a curator's best interest to provide a mix of both past and present articles whe...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - I am wondering why self-journals should necessarily be linked to individual scientists. I can imagine that groups of scientists may also have the desire to have their own self-journal, but it seems that this would not be possible...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "Usage statistics (altmetrics) are even less reliable since they ... may be derived from sources unrelated to science" The fact that altmetrics may be derived from sources unrelated to science in my view does not mean that they are unreliable...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - I like a lot the idea of peer review being open, but at the same time I also think there will remain a need for some form of anonymous peer review...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - I feel somewhat uneasy about the binary distinction that is introduced here. I think I would personally find it difficult to work in such a binary framework...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - "The importance of an article is thus socially determined and field, time and culture-dependent...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
Priority
9
Stress in crisis managers: evidence from self-report and psychophysiological assessments
On 2016 May 25
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - "The importance of an article is thus socially determined and field, time and culture-dependent...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - I like a lot the idea of peer review being open, but at the same time I also think there will remain a need for some form of anonymous peer review...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - I am wondering why self-journals should necessarily be linked to individual scientists. I can imagine that groups of scientists may also have the desire to have their own self-journal, but it seems that this would not be possible...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - In my view, a starting point of the discussion on gaming should be that any measurement system will in some way be susceptible to gaming (Goodhart's law)...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - This section needs to be better integrated in the rest of the paper. Open science hasn't been discussed at all in earlier parts of the paper, and therefore it appears rather unexpectedly in this section of the paper...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - "We have proposed and described an evaluation system that promotes a well-defined notion of scientific value in which objective and subjective aspects are disentangled as validity and importance...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - I like many of the ideas proposed in the paper. I am not sure whether all ideas will be equally successful, but in general I believe that the paper suggests the right direction in which scientific publishing and research evaluation should develop...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 13 - I think the introduction section can be strengthened by making explicit links with the ide...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 13 - "Criticism of the current academic evaluation system traditionally focuses on the problematic use of journal reputation as a proxy for scientific quality...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - I feel somewhat uneasy about the binary distinction that is introduced here. I think I would personally find it difficult to work in such a binary framework...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "Usage statistics (altmetrics) are even less reliable since they ... may be derived from sources unrelated to science" The fact that altmetrics may be derived from sources unrelated to science in my view does not mean that they are unreliable...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "It is in a curator's best interest to provide a mix of both past and present articles whe...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "unlike citations and usage statistics, two accomplices are unable to create an infinite loop that boosts the importance of each other's articles...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - The idea of open source modules is briefly introduced, but a proper explanation is lacking...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "we argue that they are in many respects preferable to journal rankings and impact factors in capturing scientific value" Why do you focus so strongly on journals in your argument? What about indicators based on the citations received by the articles of a scientist (e...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "in nature an is" -> "in nature and is"
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 13 - I think the introduction section can be strengthened by making explicit links with the ide...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 13 - "Criticism of the current academic evaluation system traditionally focuses on the problematic use of journal reputation as a proxy for scientific quality...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - "The importance of an article is thus socially determined and field, time and culture-dependent...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - I feel somewhat uneasy about the binary distinction that is introduced here. I think I would personally find it difficult to work in such a binary framework...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - I like a lot the idea of peer review being open, but at the same time I also think there will remain a need for some form of anonymous peer review...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "Usage statistics (altmetrics) are even less reliable since they ... may be derived from sources unrelated to science" The fact that altmetrics may be derived from sources unrelated to science in my view does not mean that they are unreliable...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - I am wondering why self-journals should necessarily be linked to individual scientists. I can imagine that groups of scientists may also have the desire to have their own self-journal, but it seems that this would not be possible...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "It is in a curator's best interest to provide a mix of both past and present articles whe...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - In my view, a starting point of the discussion on gaming should be that any measurement system will in some way be susceptible to gaming (Goodhart's law)...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "unlike citations and usage statistics, two accomplices are unable to create an infinite loop that boosts the importance of each other's articles...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - The idea of open source modules is briefly introduced, but a proper explanation is lacking...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "we argue that they are in many respects preferable to journal rankings and impact factors in capturing scientific value" Why do you focus so strongly on journals in your argument? What about indicators based on the citations received by the articles of a scientist (e...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - This section needs to be better integrated in the rest of the paper. Open science hasn't been discussed at all in earlier parts of the paper, and therefore it appears rather unexpectedly in this section of the paper...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "in nature an is" -> "in nature and is"
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - "We have proposed and described an evaluation system that promotes a well-defined notion of scientific value in which objective and subjective aspects are disentangled as validity and importance...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - I like many of the ideas proposed in the paper. I am not sure whether all ideas will be equally successful, but in general I believe that the paper suggests the right direction in which scientific publishing and research evaluation should develop...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - "The importance of an article is thus socially determined and field, time and culture-dependent...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - I like a lot the idea of peer review being open, but at the same time I also think there will remain a need for some form of anonymous peer review...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - I am wondering why self-journals should necessarily be linked to individual scientists. I can imagine that groups of scientists may also have the desire to have their own self-journal, but it seems that this would not be possible...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - In my view, a starting point of the discussion on gaming should be that any measurement system will in some way be susceptible to gaming (Goodhart's law)...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - This section needs to be better integrated in the rest of the paper. Open science hasn't been discussed at all in earlier parts of the paper, and therefore it appears rather unexpectedly in this section of the paper...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - "We have proposed and described an evaluation system that promotes a well-defined notion of scientific value in which objective and subjective aspects are disentangled as validity and importance...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
1
0
On 2017 April 02 - I like many of the ideas proposed in the paper. I am not sure whether all ideas will be equally successful, but in general I believe that the paper suggests the right direction in which scientific publishing and research evaluation should develop...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 13 - I think the introduction section can be strengthened by making explicit links with the ide...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 13 - "Criticism of the current academic evaluation system traditionally focuses on the problematic use of journal reputation as a proxy for scientific quality...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - I feel somewhat uneasy about the binary distinction that is introduced here. I think I would personally find it difficult to work in such a binary framework...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "Usage statistics (altmetrics) are even less reliable since they ... may be derived from sources unrelated to science" The fact that altmetrics may be derived from sources unrelated to science in my view does not mean that they are unreliable...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "It is in a curator's best interest to provide a mix of both past and present articles whe...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "unlike citations and usage statistics, two accomplices are unable to create an infinite loop that boosts the importance of each other's articles...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - The idea of open source modules is briefly introduced, but a proper explanation is lacking...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "we argue that they are in many respects preferable to journal rankings and impact factors in capturing scientific value" Why do you focus so strongly on journals in your argument? What about indicators based on the citations received by the articles of a scientist (e...
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
0
0
On 2017 April 02 - "in nature an is" -> "in nature and is"
In
Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT
In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science
READ IN CONTEXT