Michael Rowe

Personal information

Affiliation(s)

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences – University of the Western Cape
Robert Sobukwe Road, Bellville 7353, Republic of South Africa

Expertise

All issues

No issue has been released yet

On 2017 April 06 - What are the legal implications of using SJS for collaborative peer review, and then takin...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - This seems like an odd place to add this information. It's presenting new information the Conclusion...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I'm wondering what the long-term implication of "always open for review" is. Imagine that, over time, a paper aggregates more and more reviews...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Have you given any thought to making the relationships between articles and self-journals ...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - As you say though, any system is open to gaming, which makes this less of a critique of this paper and more of a general comment about systems...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I can see how this would be useful to track trends of phenomena or ideas over time. It wou...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - It would be nice if these comment field allowed for basic formatting, maybe using markdown...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Again, this is only true if the majority of authors in that field choose to publish in SJS...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - This section makes it seem as if any article / web artifact (for want of a better word) can be included in a self-journal...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Are self-journal articles that are kept in different self-journals forked i.e. are they al...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Maybe it's because I'm still not 100% clear what a self-journal, but this section doesn't make sense to me...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Why self-journal at all? It's not clear to me what the value of the self-journal is. The paragraph level commenting / critiquing and post-publication review are, for me, a significant leap forward in themselves...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I also had difficulty getting my head around what a self-journal is. I don't have an alternative suggestion though :-( I'm intrigued with Ken's suggestion that this site is essentially a blog that allows paragraph level comments...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I'm also not convinced that altmetrics are unreliable. They may be a measure of some different set of relationships, but they may be reliable measures of those relationships...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I'm also not convinced that altmetrics are unreliable. They may be a measure of some different set of relationships, but they may be reliable measures of those relationships...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Many articles have been cited many times as examples of poor work. I also make sure that ...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I see that I've posted this under Comment, instead of Critique. This raises another Critique...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - The "+" next to the bulleted list doesn't work, so I'm writing my critique here. Why is i...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Perhaps ranking / rating scales could be averaged over all reviewers? This might address t...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Personally, I'm in favour of a softer approach to peer review. Putting their names on the review might remind some reviewers that they are interacting with another human being...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - The definition is clearly not meant to represent how things currently work in traditional peer review...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - With respect, I disagree completely that "...a large part of the scientific community is left out by this closed process (e...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Innovations are more likely to be considered controversial, and may therefore be less like...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I agree that "trial" may not be perfectly analogous, but I do think that it more accuratel...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I also wonder about the possibility that downgrading (to a lower ranked journal) happens to papers that may lack relative value (for higher ranked journals) but which may nonetheless include important findings...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I like the juxtaposition of the editorial board who are the assessors of value, and the authors who are trying to convince them that their articles are citable...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

Priority 9

Stress in crisis managers: evidence from self-report and psychophysiological assessments

On 2016 May 25

On 2017 April 06 - I like the juxtaposition of the editorial board who are the assessors of value, and the authors who are trying to convince them that their articles are citable...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Personally, I'm in favour of a softer approach to peer review. Putting their names on the review might remind some reviewers that they are interacting with another human being...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Are self-journal articles that are kept in different self-journals forked i.e. are they al...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I can see how this would be useful to track trends of phenomena or ideas over time. It wou...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - As you say though, any system is open to gaming, which makes this less of a critique of this paper and more of a general comment about systems...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I'm wondering what the long-term implication of "always open for review" is. Imagine that, over time, a paper aggregates more and more reviews...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - This seems like an odd place to add this information. It's presenting new information the Conclusion...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I agree that "trial" may not be perfectly analogous, but I do think that it more accuratel...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Innovations are more likely to be considered controversial, and may therefore be less like...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - With respect, I disagree completely that "...a large part of the scientific community is left out by this closed process (e...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - The definition is clearly not meant to represent how things currently work in traditional peer review...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Perhaps ranking / rating scales could be averaged over all reviewers? This might address t...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - The "+" next to the bulleted list doesn't work, so I'm writing my critique here. Why is i...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I see that I've posted this under Comment, instead of Critique. This raises another Critique...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Many articles have been cited many times as examples of poor work. I also make sure that ...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I'm also not convinced that altmetrics are unreliable. They may be a measure of some different set of relationships, but they may be reliable measures of those relationships...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I'm also not convinced that altmetrics are unreliable. They may be a measure of some different set of relationships, but they may be reliable measures of those relationships...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Maybe it's because I'm still not 100% clear what a self-journal, but this section doesn't make sense to me...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - This section makes it seem as if any article / web artifact (for want of a better word) can be included in a self-journal...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Again, this is only true if the majority of authors in that field choose to publish in SJS...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - It would be nice if these comment field allowed for basic formatting, maybe using markdown...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Have you given any thought to making the relationships between articles and self-journals ...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - What are the legal implications of using SJS for collaborative peer review, and then takin...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I like the juxtaposition of the editorial board who are the assessors of value, and the authors who are trying to convince them that their articles are citable...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I agree that "trial" may not be perfectly analogous, but I do think that it more accuratel...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Innovations are more likely to be considered controversial, and may therefore be less like...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - With respect, I disagree completely that "...a large part of the scientific community is left out by this closed process (e...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - The definition is clearly not meant to represent how things currently work in traditional peer review...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Personally, I'm in favour of a softer approach to peer review. Putting their names on the review might remind some reviewers that they are interacting with another human being...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Perhaps ranking / rating scales could be averaged over all reviewers? This might address t...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - The "+" next to the bulleted list doesn't work, so I'm writing my critique here. Why is i...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I see that I've posted this under Comment, instead of Critique. This raises another Critique...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Many articles have been cited many times as examples of poor work. I also make sure that ...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I'm also not convinced that altmetrics are unreliable. They may be a measure of some different set of relationships, but they may be reliable measures of those relationships...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I'm also not convinced that altmetrics are unreliable. They may be a measure of some different set of relationships, but they may be reliable measures of those relationships...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Maybe it's because I'm still not 100% clear what a self-journal, but this section doesn't make sense to me...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Are self-journal articles that are kept in different self-journals forked i.e. are they al...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - This section makes it seem as if any article / web artifact (for want of a better word) can be included in a self-journal...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Again, this is only true if the majority of authors in that field choose to publish in SJS...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - It would be nice if these comment field allowed for basic formatting, maybe using markdown...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I can see how this would be useful to track trends of phenomena or ideas over time. It wou...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - As you say though, any system is open to gaming, which makes this less of a critique of this paper and more of a general comment about systems...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Have you given any thought to making the relationships between articles and self-journals ...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I'm wondering what the long-term implication of "always open for review" is. Imagine that, over time, a paper aggregates more and more reviews...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - This seems like an odd place to add this information. It's presenting new information the Conclusion...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - What are the legal implications of using SJS for collaborative peer review, and then takin...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I like the juxtaposition of the editorial board who are the assessors of value, and the authors who are trying to convince them that their articles are citable...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Personally, I'm in favour of a softer approach to peer review. Putting their names on the review might remind some reviewers that they are interacting with another human being...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Are self-journal articles that are kept in different self-journals forked i.e. are they al...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I can see how this would be useful to track trends of phenomena or ideas over time. It wou...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - As you say though, any system is open to gaming, which makes this less of a critique of this paper and more of a general comment about systems...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I'm wondering what the long-term implication of "always open for review" is. Imagine that, over time, a paper aggregates more and more reviews...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - This seems like an odd place to add this information. It's presenting new information the Conclusion...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I agree that "trial" may not be perfectly analogous, but I do think that it more accuratel...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Innovations are more likely to be considered controversial, and may therefore be less like...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - With respect, I disagree completely that "...a large part of the scientific community is left out by this closed process (e...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - The definition is clearly not meant to represent how things currently work in traditional peer review...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Perhaps ranking / rating scales could be averaged over all reviewers? This might address t...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - The "+" next to the bulleted list doesn't work, so I'm writing my critique here. Why is i...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I see that I've posted this under Comment, instead of Critique. This raises another Critique...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Many articles have been cited many times as examples of poor work. I also make sure that ...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I'm also not convinced that altmetrics are unreliable. They may be a measure of some different set of relationships, but they may be reliable measures of those relationships...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - I'm also not convinced that altmetrics are unreliable. They may be a measure of some different set of relationships, but they may be reliable measures of those relationships...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Maybe it's because I'm still not 100% clear what a self-journal, but this section doesn't make sense to me...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - This section makes it seem as if any article / web artifact (for want of a better word) can be included in a self-journal...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Again, this is only true if the majority of authors in that field choose to publish in SJS...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - It would be nice if these comment field allowed for basic formatting, maybe using markdown...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - Have you given any thought to making the relationships between articles and self-journals ...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT

On 2017 April 06 - What are the legal implications of using SJS for collaborative peer review, and then takin...

In Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science

READ IN CONTEXT