Sign In
Explore
Map of Science
Advanced Search
Tutorials
Participate
Upload article
Edit self-journal
Co
v1.1 Feb 2020
Samuel Demharter
Follow Samuel Demharter
Profile
Articles
0 ARTICLES
Reviews
(0)
Discussions
(1)
Prioritizations
(1)
Self-Journal
1 SUBSCRIBER
0 ISSUE
Personal information
Affiliation(s)
Department of Computer Science - University of Oxford
Wolfson Building - Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QD, United Kingdom
Expertise
Biophysics
Bioinformatics
Protein structure
RNA structure
DNA structure
DNA modeling
All issues
Samuel Demharter's Self-Journal
No issue has been released yet
Date of release
Number of reviews
Priority
Number of editors
Reviews
Reviews
Discussions
Prioritizations
By date
By vote +
By vote -
By controversiality
2
0
On 2015 May 05 - This is why a voting system that rewards constructive/informative comments is essential. On researchgate and stackoverflow (a crowd-sourced Q&A website for programmers) "good" questions and answers are voted up and are seen at the top of the page, while "bad" comments are voted to the bottom of the page...
In
Principles of the Self-Journal of Science: bringing ethics and freedom to scientific publishing
READ IN CONTEXT
Priority
18
Principles of the Self-Journal of Science: bringing ethics and freedom to scientific publishing
On 2015 January 24
2
0
On 2015 May 05 - This is why a voting system that rewards constructive/informative comments is essential. On researchgate and stackoverflow (a crowd-sourced Q&A website for programmers) "good" questions and answers are voted up and are seen at the top of the page, while "bad" comments are voted to the bottom of the page...
In
Principles of the Self-Journal of Science: bringing ethics and freedom to scientific publishing
READ IN CONTEXT
2
0
On 2015 May 05 - This is why a voting system that rewards constructive/informative comments is essential. On researchgate and stackoverflow (a crowd-sourced Q&A website for programmers) "good" questions and answers are voted up and are seen at the top of the page, while "bad" comments are voted to the bottom of the page...
In
Principles of the Self-Journal of Science: bringing ethics and freedom to scientific publishing
READ IN CONTEXT
2
0
On 2015 May 05 - This is why a voting system that rewards constructive/informative comments is essential. On researchgate and stackoverflow (a crowd-sourced Q&A website for programmers) "good" questions and answers are voted up and are seen at the top of the page, while "bad" comments are voted to the bottom of the page...
In
Principles of the Self-Journal of Science: bringing ethics and freedom to scientific publishing
READ IN CONTEXT
In Principles of the Self-Journal of Science: bringing ethics and freedom to scientific publishing
READ IN CONTEXT